British grammar school and path of social mobility
Society was never just, from the beginning it has some kind of stratification. Class-based ( based on resources or idea of haves or haves not, simply putting rich and poor ) stratification is common among model capitalist societies, the same goes for British society which consists of class-based stratification. online assignment help edmonton
Grammar school the idea
The idea of grammar school is quite simple, these schools are state secondary schools, fully funded by the state. The selection process comprises an examination called 11- plus (students of age 11 appear in it). The education students get here is free, unlike private schools where they have to pay. The grammar school wants to create a more just and inclusive society. It focuses on the social mobility of economically weaker sections of the community.
Does grammar school increase social mobility?
In the British parliament, the idea of a more selective school ( grammar school ) is raised by plenty of leaders although some are opposing the idea of grammar schools. The government planned to expand the grammar school based on the examination of 11- and claiming it's going to pave the path of social mobility.
Kiran Eyre, a governor of a state school asserted that the notion of grammar school is not something progressive, there is no evidence to support that grammar school, improve the educational status of the weaker section.
Eyre, pointed out that selective education will widen the gap between the poor and the rich. School should be a microcosm of the whole of society. People of different colours, faith, background, and skills work together to establish a peaceful and harmonious world. Selective schools separate students of lower-income families from those of rich, if we let them study in the same school they get equal opportunities to improve their status.
On the other hand, these grammar schools are not enabling them to achieve social mobility as the acceptance rate of lower rag students is relatively inadequate. Only 3% of the students at grammar schools are qualified to get free meals which is an indicator of their social status. Some data indicate that high-achieving poor kids are not able to get into grammar schools. Of those who are top scorers 66% of them are from better-off families only 40% are from poor households.
Melissa Benn, the chairperson of the Comprehensive Future Group, talked about, how the government is making an effort to increase the number of poor students in grammar schools, however, asking grammar schools to admit more poor students only hampers the system of education to achieve equality.
We can say that the concept of the grammar school was not that empowering rather it will create a gap between haves and haves not.,if students from the rich class and poor study together, they will comprehend each other's lives and get equal opportunities to excel. The experts from the education field analysed that selective education systems only broaden the gap in society. True social mobility can be achieved by equal opportunity, not selective methods. As most grammar schools in England do not have proper representation of the disadvantaged group even though it was designed for the disadvantaged group.
Adams, R. (2018, May 11). Education leaders oppose Tory plans to expand grammar schools. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/may/11/education-leaders-oppose-tory-plans-to-expand-grammar-schools